Platform

Continuity. Uncertainty. Trust.

Three connected capabilities for autonomous and distributed systems operating under degraded command conditions.

The Core Insight

A valid message can still be operationally unsafe.

Traditional communications and security models focus on delivery, encryption, authentication and route availability. Those are necessary foundations. They do not answer whether a message is still fresh, contextually legitimate, custody-coherent or safe to act on under the current mission state.

Resolvix addresses the gap between technical validity and operational trust.

Transport

Routing moves packets.

Security

Cryptography verifies authenticity.

Resolvix

Is this message still fresh, custody-consistent, context-valid and safe to trust?

The Three Layers

Three layers. One survivability architecture.

Layer 1

Mission-message continuity

HOLDFAST

Core, Adapt and Sentry. Preserves critical command, telemetry, custody and mission-evidence traffic over degraded bearers; estimates receiver-visible severity and uncertainty when communications evidence becomes ambiguous.

Explore HOLDFAST

Layer 2

Mission-context assurance

AURM-NET

Assesses whether commands, telemetry, custody transitions, PNT state, video state, RF confidence and autonomy state remain trustworthy. Improves trust correctness, not packet delivery.

Explore AURM-NET

Layer 3

Maritime scenario validation

POSEIDON

Controlled simulation and validation environment for testing HOLDFAST and AURM-NET under degraded RF, C2, PNT, relay, distributed ISR and autonomy conditions.

Explore POSEIDON
Integration Principles

Designed to strengthen existing systems.

  • Protocol-neutral where possible.
  • Bearer-agnostic by design.
  • Compatible with sidecar or in-band evidence patterns.
  • Designed for constrained edge environments.
  • Human-review aware.
  • Evidence-first rather than command-authority-first.
  • Simulation-backed before field claims.
Scope

What we do. What we do not do.

What we do

  • Preserve mission-message continuity
  • Assess receiver-visible degradation uncertainty
  • Evaluate command freshness and custody continuity
  • Assess PNT, video, telemetry and autonomy-state confidence
  • Produce operator-facing assurance evidence
  • Support bounded mission decisions by authorised systems

What we do not do

  • Replace radios or waveforms
  • Control RF systems
  • Classify real jammers
  • Fly the drone
  • Issue commands
  • Control weapons
  • Make autonomous targeting decisions
  • Claim field, anti-jam or anti-spoof validation before hardware evidence exists
Claim Boundaries

What Resolvix is not.

  • Resolvix is not building a new radio.
  • Resolvix is not building a new waveform.
  • Resolvix is not replacing existing C2 systems.
  • Resolvix is not an autopilot.
  • Resolvix is not an autonomous weapons system.
  • Resolvix does not improve packet delivery via AURM.
  • Resolvix does not claim operational validation until field-relevant validation is complete.